Screen resolution: 1024x768px | Auto width
Best viewed in Firefox, IE7 or Safari
Search

Article Archive
Business
Community
Consumerism
Doing It in France
Education and Learning
Expat Issues
Eye on France
Features
Finance and Banking
Health, Welfare and Fitness
Local Living
Motoring
Outdoors and Nature
Pets and Animals
Profiles of Residents
Property and Pools
Reading
Table Talk
Travel
Visiting the Riviera
Yachting and Boating
Bits n Pieces
Article Archive RSS
Article Archive RSS Feed
Home arrow Expat Issues arrow Abolishing of French health cover for Expats? Don’t panic!
Abolishing of French health cover for Expats? Don’t panic! Print
Written by Mike Meade - Sept 2007   

Expathealthdirect’s Peter Owen sheds a measured light on a largely exaggerated situation following Mike Meade's outline on the background to the recent panic.

There is an update to this article here and other relevant links are here
The "Sécu" also offers guidance on this and other related topics in English here

Inspired by distortions by an “expert”, several British newspaper reports in early September sent an unjustified wave of panic through the expat community in France. The stories, and their enhanced internet repeats, conjured up visions of masses of British expats being “brutally” abandoned by the Securité Sociale under direct instructions from President Sarkozy.

Early on during his election campaign, the candidate Sarkozy made his feelings clear: “If you think 53 makes you old enough to retire, then fine, go ahead and retire. But don’t expect the state to pay for it.” The new measure simply puts this theory into practice.

Until now some Britons who were previously covered by the NHS and who took up French residence before retirement age benefited from France’s healthcare system without having ever paid into it. It was a profoundly unfair situation especially since many of these expats had never paid into the NHS either. They simply benefited from NHS cover by virtue of their previous UK resident status. Some did indeed pay into the clapped out old banger of an NHS but then received the sleek racing car of the Securité Sociale when they took early retirement in France.

Sarko seems to want to weed out a few freeloaders and the many comments on the London Times website largely support the French attitude. One British comment — “Sarkozy's dead right and we should follow suit” - echoed most opinions.

So what’s the reality? As an expat, your right to the same healthcare as the locals is unaffected if any of these situations apply to you:

  • you work (or worked until retirement age) legally in France either as self-employed or salaried
  • you pay your annual 8% contribution into the French CMU system
  • you were covered by the NHS in Britain and you are above retirement age and in receipt of the UK state pension
  • you are a visitor covered by the EHIC card for necessary care 


Here Peter Owen sets the record straight on who might be at risk:


The legislation refers to immigration and integration of foreigners in France and conditions of residence. One of these conditions is having adequate financial resources and not being a burden on the social security system including health.

 Those affiliating to the CPAM via E Forms (E121, E106 etc) are not affected at all by this legislation.

Expathealthdirect has no evidence that those who are affiliated under the CMU legislation (ie; under residence criteria and are paying the 8% "cotisation") are affected either.

More vulnerable are those who do not pay contributions and have a free "top up" insurance (because of low declared income) and are therefore receiving almost free healthcare. It implies that you may not have the financial resources to live in France — which has always been a condition of residence. With the demise of the "carte de séjour" for EU/Swiss nationals it has been a difficult rule to enforce but even those in this category have been acting in accordance with CMU Law 99-641 dated 27 July 1999.

The most vulnerable of all, and deservedly so, are those who have managed to affiliate via residence criteria and have under-declared their income or have not made a French tax return at all. The new measure targets mainly these people and their resident families.

For those UK nationals below retirement age who come to live but not work in France an E106 can be obtained which is valid for up to 2 years. To date if they were still under retirement age on expiry of their E106 they simply transferred to the CMU scheme and paid the 8%. What is not clear at this time is if such people will continue to be able to make this transfer or whether the CPAM will simply withdraw cover at this point.
Refusal of the CPAM to cover after E106 expiry is not at all certain but not to be ruled out either and it is a topic we will explore — perhaps for a later issue when the new measures are put into actual practice. It looks quite probable (but not sure) that those who show declared income above the thresholds and therefore are subject to the 8% cotisation will be accepted as before whereas those not filing French income tax returns will be refused.

This is a constantly evolving subject and the picture will be clearer as CPAM offices interpret this new legislation. The initial assessment, therefore, is that any threat of large scale withdrawal of health cover for those in the expatriate community is unjustified.

Comments (9)add
...
written by Riviera Reporter , 19 December 2007
...
written by Sophie , 24 December 2007
This is just another example of how we let the French walk all over us. Some of us have been paying the CMU for years and now we're left with nothing for it.

Let's do unto others... and plunge all those French immigrants in the UK into the same hot water.
...
written by James , 28 December 2007
We were going to move to France but now we will keep our money in the UK. We are not going to live wondering what the ungrateful French will do to us next.
...
written by DandBarb , 09 January 2008
The only people affected are those who have chosen to take early retirement (so can afford private insurance) or people not covered by a EU NI/pension scheme. There's a good piece on this at: http://my.telegraph.co.uk/owen..._train.htm
...
written by HappyInFrance , 11 January 2008
James, don't think that you'd be helping France by moving there. Most foreigners get more than they give. They drive up property prices so that local people can't even buy a house anymore.
...
written by Riviera Reporter , 19 January 2008
Up to date information on the new healthcare rules is on the website of expathealthdirect at http://www.expathealthdirect.co.uk/html.htm
...
written by Hampton Foster , 05 February 2008
Your updates on health care have been pertinent but you have omitted to include the fact that it is illegal under EU law to refuse critical health care to anyone. The European Court has stated that "an issue may arise under Article 2 if the authorities of a Contracting State put an individual's life at risk through denial of health care which they have undertaken to make available to the population generally". R. Hampton-Foster, Cannes
...
written by R. Wall , 08 February 2008
What we need is a Europe-wide Health care system that works the same everywhere and where patients can be sent to the country which best handles their particular illness.
...
written by Mark Hisbern , 14 February 2008
Social security health care continues for life but is only paid for until retirement. Private health care has to be paid for forever even when ones income drops after retirement. And a private health insurere can go bust. Try finding another one when you're 65. Maybe this health insurance problem should remind us of that?
Write your comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Type the displayed characters in lower case


busy
 
Whimsical Wits - Jokes