|
From Reporter Issue 89
CHOICES
When setting up your business you will have to decide on a statute,
in other words the way the business will be structured socially,
financially and legally. Each option has its pros and cons.
The most common statutes are listed here but there are others
such as Societé de Fait, S.C.I. (specific to property development) or
S.N.C. A good expert-comptable is your best source of counsel but your
local CCI, Chambre des Métiers or Maison des Entreprises can also offer
invaluable advice.
Entreprise Individuelle (sole trader): A small flexible
structure often preferred by artisans, tradesmen and small shops. Setup
expenses, taxes and charges are less than those paid by limited
companies but beware of one vital point – the sole trader is
responsible on his personal assets for debts and misdemeanours of the
business. Profits are taxed as personal income and social charges are
paid on an unsalaried basis. A version of the entreprise individuelle
can be a profession liberale – an entreprise individuelle structure
often used by medical, architectural, financial and legal
professionals.
SARL, Société a Résponsibilité Limitée (limited liability company):
This is a statute often chosen by those who want to share the financial
burden with others and who also want to limit shareholders’ personal
liability in case of business failure. The number of shareholders can
be from 2 to 50. A gérant (managing director) must be appointed and,
whether or not he is a majority shareholder, he is the one legally
responsible for the company’s dealings. He can also be held financially
responsible if a serious managerial fault can be proved to a Tribunal de Commerce.
Over-investing beyond a reasonable probability of repaying would
normally be considered as a managerial fault and could result in thegérant being held responsible on his personal assets. Other
shareholders are only responsible up to the value of their shares. Agérant who is also a minority shareholder is usually paid a salary. If
the gérant is a majority shareholder he can be paid on a non-salaried
basis much like a sole trader. A gérant, like a sole trader,
does not benefit from unemployment benefits in case of bankruptcy or
closure. A variance of the SARL is the EURL, a limited liability company with only one shareholder.
SA, Société Anonyme: Comparable to the British PLC, the
SA is a larger structure than the SARL and often a result of its
expansion. The minimum number of shareholders is 7. There is no
maximum. The managing director is paid a salary and, like the gérant of
an SARL, can be held personally responsible for managerial faults.
There are a couple of atypical structures that can also be considered in exceptional cases. The first is the non-profit association. At one time, some ipso facto
businesses hid behind the fiscal advantages once offered by this
statute. In recent years however, tax rules concerning associations
have been very much tightened and are now almost identical to those of
any other business. These days, non-profit does indeed mean non-profit
and salaries (which bear social charges) cannot be used to disguise
profit. Association members cannot be salaried by the association. An
association cannot enter into direct competition with legitimate
businesses in any way (a magazine tried this a while back and we had
them stopped) without paying the same charges, taxes and TVA as its
competitors. So, the association is only a useful structure for those
whose activity is truly not commercial.
A very different statute is a branch, agency or liaison office
of a foreign company. This must be declared to the RCS; the person
responsible for branch or liaison offices may be paid by the foreign
parent company but must register and pay into French national health
and retirement funds. The profits tax (IS) applies to profits generated
in France and any French resident employed by a branch office pays
income tax here as well. French law considers that a person is fiscally
domiciled in France if the centre of his personal or business life is
here or if he spends more than 182 days a year in France. If any one
criterion is met he will be expected to pay income tax in France on his
worldwide income. In principle any business trading here is liable for
French tax on profits generated by their activities in France even if
these activities are the accomplishment of a foreign company.
International tax agreements can sometimes be invoked to prevent double
taxation.
© Riviera Reporter
|