Screen resolution: 1024x768px | Auto width
Best viewed in Firefox, IE7 or Safari
Marie Curie Cancer Care

Search

Article Archive
Business
Community
Consumerism
Doing It in France
Education and Learning
Expat Issues
Eye on France
Features
Finance and Banking
Health, Welfare and Fitness
Local Living
Motoring
Outdoors and Nature
Pets and Animals
Profiles of Residents
Property and Pools
Reading
Table Talk
Travel
Visiting the Riviera
Yachting and Boating
Bits n Pieces
Article Archive RSS
Article Archive RSS Feed
Home arrow Local Living arrow Monaco calling
Monaco calling Print
Written by Riviera Reporter   

When Monaco opened its new consulate-general in London recently Prince Albert summoned the press to the Ritz Hotel to hear his appeal for more Brits to settle in the Principality, joining the 2200 already there who make up the third largest expat community after the French and the Italians. An official suggested that the ideal settler would be "a man in his forties with a wife, two children and lots of money". So what awaits the new arrival in what the OECD has once again denounced as "an uncooperative tax haven" (a description fiercely contested by the Monegasque authorities)?

First there's the look of the place which about the time Prince Albert was in London Michael Winner described ­ quite unfairly, in our view ­ as "a hideous overdeveloped piece of tat". What has to be reckoned with, though, for anyone not seriously working, is a likely existence of stifling boredom, a routine of endless cappuccinos, the occasional highlight of one of those Celebrity Lunches and intense gossip about other people's conjugal crises and sexual realignments. Gossip on the telephone can be dangerous, remember, since calls may be monitored (as a former police chief once told us, "only bad boys need worry about that"); anyone seeking further information on this point could try calling Monaco Telecom's new English helpline on +377 99 66 33 00.

As the Prince stressed, security is guaranteed in his realm and both residents and visitors are constantly under the attentive eye of the dozens of cameras which scan public areas on behalf of the Sûreté Publique. The legal system exemplifies those famous "ancient traditions, customs and practices" and attracts some criticism elsewhere. Anyone who upsets a person with pull in high places may be asked to leave pronto. The curiosities of the system were illustrated by the recent outcome of two cases we've reported on. Fraudster William Fogwell, former friend of the Family, had his five-year jail term confirmed plus a half a million euro fine. It's still obscure why, having been allowed to leave Monaco, he returned voluntarily to face his judges. His victims, ­ he took some €165 million off them, ­ remain enraged that none of their money seemingly has been recovered. As an odd postscript to this affair Fogwell's lawyer announced that he was suing the judge for misconduct.

Meanwhile poor sad Marc Giacone, the cathedral organist who had been threatened with prison for making schoolboyish fun on his website of Prince Albert and other notables, was finally let off with a fine. A wise move for the Grimaldis in PR terms. And a last piece of advice: when Loadsamoney arrives in Monaco he shouldn't go for a Chelsea tractor (congestion charges may be on the way) but take the bus or use one of the free bicycles now provided.


From Riviera Reporter 124 - Dec 2007/Jan 2008

Comments (5)add
...
written by William Fogwell , 29 February 2008
Regarding your article referring to me in your Dec / Jan issue I should like to make the following comments:

Perhaps the obscurity of my voluntary return to face my judges would be lessened if my statement during the trial had been reported: "I returned in order to bring some truth to a story exaggerated through gossip and innuendo for reasons known only to those who perpetuate the story and to lay to rest the falsity perpetrated by the fee-earning professionals which further victimises my former clients by leading them to believe that 165 million euros is hidden somewhere mysterious and that by continuing to re-run the story their lost investments will be returned to them. But the losses are indeed losses from legitimate trading activities on the international financial markets, just as the recent losses of hundreds of millions of by leading French financial institutions are losses and not referred to by anyone as fraud, nor the managers of those institutions as fraudsters.

I also object, as I have done in the past, to any implication of involvement by the first family.
...
written by Walgren , 01 April 2008
Are you saying you're innocent? That's what every convicted man says, isn't it?
...
written by Schreiber , 20 May 2008
I have known Bill and Shelley Fogwell for many years and the only crime they've commited is to hire unprofessional staff...who saw themselves as the Monaco golden-boys.
A question ? Would anyone return to face his judges if seating on 165 million ? ???
...
written by johan klouwer , 05 September 2008
Bill you're still my friend

Johan klouwer
...
written by anonymous , 05 September 2008
I can assure you that the practises of the fogwells and their unprofessional and self serving staff misappropriated invested funds for their own purposes. There were losses because all people involved were totally clueless and neither one had finanial expertise, but not all funds were genuine company losses. Giving them benefit of the doubt and listening to their story, certain things were disclosed , and although small confessions, it was clear luxury items were purchased and hidden bank accounts mentioned. If this were in any other country in the developed and regulated world they would be made accountable . Instead they make a mockery of the whole incident having no regard or remorse for their activities.
Write your comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Type the displayed characters in lower case


busy